The headline signal — how confidence moved from the previous snapshot, and why.
vs 2.1.7+0.01 ▲
Moved from 2.1.7 0.50 ± 0.11 to 0.51 ± 0.10 - mean step of +0.01 and the band tightening as the named catalyst resolved. Warsh was sworn in as Fed chair Friday in a White House ceremony with Trump participating - the first White House Fed-chair swearing-in since Greenspan in 1987, an unusual venue that marginally firms the Fed-independence-stress read. The step is small and the posterior stays diffuse because no Warsh-as-chair policy substance has landed - first public remarks and the June 16-17 FOMC are the real tells - while Friday's easing yields leave the inherited higher-for-longer backdrop in tension with Warsh's "room to cut" framing without resolving it. The band tightens 0.11 to 0.10 as one source of uncertainty - whether the transition would proceed on schedule - is now retired. Beta(11.2, 10.8) ~22 effective observations.
The thesis
The claim and where confidence stands now.
Beta(11.2, 10.8) · 95% CI [0.31–0.71]
Powell completed his Fed chair-term exit Friday May 15 2026 with conciliatory final remarks: advised Warsh to "stay out of elected politics" and pledged to keep a low profile as a governor through his Board term to 2028. Senate had confirmed Warsh as Federal Reserve Chair 54-45 on Wednesday May 13 - the narrowest modern-era margin since the current approval process was put in place in 1977; Fetterman (D-PA) was the only Democratic crossover. Warsh's formal swearing-in ceremony is scheduled for Friday May 22 2026 at the White House - confirmed by the May 15 Fed Reserve announcement of Powell as chair pro tempore until Warsh is sworn in. The 13-11 party-line Banking Committee advance, the prior 51-45 governor confirmation, and the 54-45 chair confirmation all stand as historically partisan Fed-Chair-track outcomes. Warsh confirmation-hearing framing - "won''t be sock puppet" and "room to cut without inflation" - introduces a dovish-tilt risk. Friday May 15 delivered the sharpest rate-path repricing of the cycle: 10Y to 4.59%, CME FedWatch hike-by-December to ~56% from ~36% Thursday. Monday May 18 intraday extended to 4.61-4.63% before pulling back to a 4.601% close on the strike-cancellation flow; Tuesday May 19 closed 10Y at 4.62% (intraday high 4.67%), the rate-path repricing reasserting. Global yields (German bund 15-year high, JGB 10Y 29-year high) remain elevated. The contradiction between Warsh's "room to cut" framing and the inherited backdrop (CPI 3.8%, PPI +6.0% YoY, imports +4.2% YoY, 10Y 4.62%) remains in place, but the substantive transition question still opens later: first Warsh-as-chair public statements come after the Friday May 22 White House ceremony, and the first Warsh-as-chair FOMC is June 16-17. Update May 20: the hawkish April 29 minutes (officials debating hikes; hike-by-December ~63%) sharpen the contradiction with Warsh's "room to cut" framing, but the substantive transition still opens only after the Friday May 22 swearing-in. Update May 22: Warsh took the oath as Fed chair Friday in a White House ceremony with President Trump participating - the first White House Fed-chair swearing-in since Greenspan in 1987, a venue choice that underscores the Fed-independence-stress lens. The named catalyst has now resolved, but no Warsh-as-chair policy substance has landed - first public remarks and the June 16-17 FOMC remain the operative tells.
Drivers
The underlying macro forces this thesis expresses - the loading mean is how much each force drives the thesis, the stddev our confidence in the mapping.
Supporting evidence
Typed, citation-backed observations across time, grouped by strength. Hover a point for the claim.
What would invalidate this
The machine-evaluable conditions that would falsify the thesis.